Nepotismo y meritocracia en el sector público colombiano: implicaciones emocionales y efectos sobre la satisfacción laboral Nepotism and Meritocracy in the Colombian Public Sector: Emotional Implications and Effects on Job Satisfaction
Main Article Content
-
Lizbeth N. Layton-Almeida
- Conceptualization
- Investigation
- Data Curation
- Validation
- Visualization
- Writing – Original Draft Preparation
- Writing – Review & Editing
Competing InterestsThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest related to the preparation or publication of this article.
-
Jhonatan S. Castillo-Mejía
- Data Curation
- Methodology
- Formal Analysis
- Software
- Investigation
- Visualization
- Writing – Original Draft Preparation
- Writing – Review & Editing
Competing InterestsThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest related to the preparation or publication of this article.
-
Orlando E. Contreras-Pacheco
- Supervision
- Conceptualization
- Project Administration
- Methodology
- Validation
- Writing – Review & Editing
Competing InterestsThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest related to the preparation or publication of this article.
https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9008-4647
How to Cite
Problemática: el nepotismo, entendido como la preferencia hacia familiares o allegados en los procesos de selección y promoción, continúa vulnerando los principios de meritocracia y justicia organizacional en el sector público colombiano, afectando la equidad, la legitimidad institucional y el bienestar emocional de los servidores públicos. Objetivo: este estudio tuvo como propósito examinar las relaciones entre el nepotismo percibido, las emociones —particularmente la felicidad y el nerviosismo— y la satisfacción laboral en empleados del sector público colombiano. Metodología: se realizó una investigación cuantitativa mediante modelamiento de ecuaciones estructurales por mínimos cuadrados parciales, utilizando datos secundarios provenientes de encuestas aplicadas a empleados de organizaciones públicas colombianas. Resultados: el análisis evidenció relaciones entre la percepción de nepotismo, el bienestar emocional y la satisfacción laboral de los empleados públicos. Conclusión: los resultados sugieren que el nepotismo percibido se relaciona con el bienestar emocional y la satisfacción laboral, lo que refuerza la importancia de fortalecer los sistemas de mérito, transparencia y equidad en la gestión del talento humano. Contribución/originalidad: el estudio aporta evidencia empírica sobre la relación conjunta entre nepotismo, emociones y satisfacción laboral en el sector público colombiano.
Problem statement: Perceived nepotism, understood as preferential treatment toward relatives or close associates in recruitment, promotion, or recognition processes, may undermine meritocracy, organizational justice, and transparency in the Colombian public sector. Objective: This study examined the relationships between perceived nepotism, emotions—particularly happiness and nervousness—and job satisfaction among Colombian public-sector employees. Methodology: A quantitative study was conducted using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling and secondary survey data from employees in Colombian public-sector organizations. Results: Higher perceived nepotism was associated with greater nervousness, lower happiness, and lower job satisfaction. Happiness showed a positive and statistically significant relationship with job satisfaction, whereas nervousness was not significantly associated with this variable. The evaluated indirect effects were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Perceived nepotism is related to employees’ emotional well-being and job satisfaction, highlighting the importance of strengthening merit-based systems, transparency, and equity in public-sector human talent management. Contribution/Originality: The study provides empirical evidence on the joint relationship between nepotism, emotions, and job satisfaction in the Colombian public sector, a context that remains underexplored in Latin American literature, while examining the potential mediating roles of happiness and nervousness.
References
Abalkhail, J. M. (2022). Dysfunctional leadership: investigating employee experiences with dysfunctional leaders. Career Development International, 27(3), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-04-2021-0109
Achor, S. (2011). The happiness advantage: The seven principles of positive psychology that fuel success and performance at work. Virgin Books / Random House. https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/410317/the-happiness-advantage-by-shawn-achor/9780753539477
Ahmad, I., y Umrani W. A. (2019). The impact of ethical leadership style on job satisfaction: Mediating role of perception of Green HRM and psychological safety. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(5), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-12-2018-0461
Akca, M. (2020). An Investigation of the Relationship Between Favoritism and Workplace Deviance: Meditation Role of Negative Emotions. En N. Sharma (Ed.), Analyzing Workplace Deviance in Modern Organizations (pp. 114-138). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9996-8.ch007
Arasli, H., Bavik, A., y Ekiz, E. H. (2006). The effects of nepotism on human resource management: The case of three, four and five star hotels in Northern Cyprus. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 26(7-8), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330610680399
Arasli, H., y Tümer, M. (2008). Nepotism, favoritism and cronyism: A study of their effects on job stress and job satisfaction in the banking industry of North Cyprus. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 36(9), 1237-1250. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2008.36.9.1237
Arayssi, M., Fakih, A., y Haimoun, N. (2023). Skill Mismatch, Nepotism, Job Satisfaction, and Young Females in the MENA Region. Econometrics, 11(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics11020016
Arslan, M. (2018). Organizational cynicism and employee performance. Journal of Global Responsibility, 9(4), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-05-2018-0014
Bilal, A. R., Fatima, T., e Imran, M. K. (2020). Shutting Eyes to Merit! The Curse of Cronyism in Pakistani Small and Medium Scale Business. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 7(1), 61–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/2322093720918997
Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1964.tb00583.x
Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G., y Verhoest, K. (2010). The coordination of public sector organizations: Shifting patterns of public management. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230275256
Darling, S., y Cunningham, B. (2023). Perceived Causes of Career Plateau in the Public Service. Administrative Sciences, 13(3), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13030073
Davey, H. M., Barratt, A. L., Butow, P. N., y Deeks, J. J. (2007). A one-item question with a Likert or Visual Analog Scale adequately measured current anxiety. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(4), 356-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.07.015
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34
Diener, E., Oishi, S., y Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, Culture, and Subjective Well-being: Emotional and Cognitive Evaluations of Life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 403-425. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056
Fisher, C. D. (2010). Happiness at work. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 384-412.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00270.x
Fisher, G. G., Matthews, R. A., y Gibbons, A. M. (2016). Developing and investigating the use of single-item measures in organizational research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039139
Fornell, C., y Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Gashi, A., Krasniqi, B., Ramadani, V., y Berisha, G. (2024). Evaluating the impact of individual and country-level institutional factors on subjective well-being among entrepreneurs. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(2), 100486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100486
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., y Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hernández, J. I. (2024). Fighting Corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean at a Supranational Level: Balances and Challenges of the Inter-American Convention Against Corruption. Revista Derecho del Estado, (59), 261-290. https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n59.09
Hudson, S., González-Gómez, H. y Claasen, C. (2019). Legitimacy, Particularism and Employee Commitment and Justice. Journal of Business Ethics, 157, 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3685-1
Hwang, Y., Shi, X., y Wang. X. (2021). Hospitality employees’ emotions in the workplace: a systematic review of recent literature. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(10), 3752–3796. https://doi.org/10.1108/
Khairy, H. A., y Elzek, Y. (2024). The impact of nepotism and workplace gossip on job performance in travel agencies and hotels in Egypt: the moderating role of organizational justice. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality & Tourism, 23(1), 52–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332845.2023.2253673
Kim, M., y Moon, J. (2021). The relationship among nepotism, leader legitimacy, and work engagement: Focus on distribution industry. Journal of Distribution Science, 19(7), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.19.7.202107.41
Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. En M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297–1343). Rand McNally. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238742406_The_Nature_and_Causes_of_Job_Satisfaction
Longo, F. (2006): Mérito y flexibilidad. La gestión de las personas en las organizaciones del sector público. Paidós. https://merit.url.edu/es/publications/m%C3%A9rito-y-flexibilidad-la-gesti%C3%B3n-de-las-personas-en-las-organizac-2/
Lyubomirsky, S., Lepper, H. S. (1999). A Measure of Subjective Happiness: Preliminary Reliability and Construct Validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006824100041
Ng, S-m. (2013). Validation of the 10-item Chinese perceived stress scale in elderly service workers: one-factor versus two-factor structure. BMC Psychology, 1(9). https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-7283-1-9
Nunnally, J. C., y Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3.ª ed.). McGraw-Hill. https://books.google.com.co/books/about/Psychometric_Theory_3E.html?id=_6R_f3G58JsC
Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., y Acar, M. (2013). Review of The Handbook of Public Administration. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(4), 773–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2013.12001763
Ramió, C. (2016). La renovación de la función pública. Estrategias para frenar la corrupción política en España. La Catarata. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7573661
Ríos-Figueroa, J., y Soto-Tamayo, L. (2024). Nepotism: One Concept, Three Measurement Strategies. A Comparative Analysis in the Mexican Judiciary. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 44(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-090x2024005000102
Sainz, M., Moreno-Bella, E., y Torres-Vega, L. (2023). Perceived unequal and unfair workplaces trigger lower job satisfaction and lower workers’ dignity via organizational dehumanization and workers’ self-objectification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 921–938. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2944
Scarpello, V., y Campbell, J. P. (1983). Job satisfaction: Are all the parts there? Personnel Psychology, 36(3), 577-600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1983.tb02236.x
Shulga, L. V., Busser, J. A., y Molintas, D. H. R. (2024). Hospitality Front-line Employees: A Meta-Analysis of Emotion Management at Work. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 66(2), 172-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/19389655241249605
Vigoda-Gadot, E. (Ed.). (2002). Public administration: An interdisciplinary critical analysis. CRC Press. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.1201/b12437/public-administration-eran-vigoda-gadot
Vveinhardt, J., y Bendaraviciene, R. (2022). How Do Nepotism and Favouritism Affect Organisational Climate? Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.710140
Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., y Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247
Xu, T., Ahmed, B., Bari, M.W. et al. (2024). Mediating Role of Knowledge Hiding Behaviors Between Cronyism and Job Performance: An Evidence from Public Sector Universities. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15, 18328–18349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01834-y
Yasmeen, R., Bibi, M., y Raza, A. (2019). Impact of Organization Politics on Human Resource Management Practices and Employee Performance. SEISENSE Journal of Management, 2(2), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.33215/sjom.v2i2.118
Yavas, U., Babakus, E., y Karatepe, O. M. (2013). Does hope moderate the impact of job burnout on frontline bank employees’ in‐role and extra‐role performances? International Journal of Bank Marketing, 31(1) 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652321311292056
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors transfer the patrimonial rights of their article to the Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP, while retaining the moral rights to their works. Articles in the journal Administración & Desarrollo are subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike Attribution License that allows third parties to copy, reproduce, distribute, publicly communicate the work, and create derivative works, provided that the original author is cited and acknowledged, the first publication in this journal is indicated, the work is not used for commercial purposes, and the distribution of derivative works is done under a license of the same type.
The CC BY-NC-ND license was previously used, but it was changed to CC BY-NC-SA.
